Journal of Medical Academics

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Correlation Study of Axial Ocular Parameters with Height among Emmetropic Candidates appearing for Medical Evaluation

Sridhara Reddy, Anjali Maheshwari, Pawan Gampa Kumar, Nithya Nair

Keywords : Anterior chamber depth, Axial length, Biometry, Pachymetry

Citation Information : Reddy S, Maheshwari A, Kumar PG, Nair N. Correlation Study of Axial Ocular Parameters with Height among Emmetropic Candidates appearing for Medical Evaluation. Journal of Medical Academics 2021; 4 (2):44-47.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11003-0108

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of our study was to determine any correlation between age, height, and ocular biometric variables, namely, pachymetry (central corneal thickness [CCT]), axial length (AL), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) in candidates appearing for medical evaluation. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted among the candidates reporting to a medical evaluation center of the Indian Air Force (IAF) for selection to military duties. A total of 724 emmetropic eyes of 362 candidates in the age group of 16–30 years were studied. All candidates were evaluated for AL, ACD, CCT, and height was measured. The data was analyzed by inferential statistics like unpaired t-test and Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by testing of Pearson's correlation coefficient r. The p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 334 males and 28 females were enlisted in this study. The mean height of males and females was 174.45 ± 6.510 and 159.04 ± 3.837 cm, respectively. The mean AL (23.73 vs 23.14 mm, p < 0.001) and CCT (512.88 vs 504.98 µ, p < 0.841) were significantly greater in male candidates and ACD (3.60 vs 3.68 mm, p < 0.229) was more in female candidates. The mean CCT in males and females was 512.88 ± 26.978 and 504.98 ± 21.794 mm, respectively. Mann–Whitney U test showed that there were no significant mean difference between CCT and gender (p - 0.841). Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there was no significant difference between age groups and AL (p < 0.05). The mean AL in males and females was 23.73 ± 0.678, and 23.14 ± 0.353 mm, respectively, and there was a significant mean difference between AL and gender (p - 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation noted between AL and height of the candidates. Conclusion: The study revealed a positive correlation between AL and height. Individual height is one of the important parameters in assessing the fitness of candidates, along with axial biometry. Emmetropic refraction can be seen by the process of compensation or attenuation of variable axial biometric parameters. We recommend that AL criteria should be correlated with height parameters in candidates with myopia or any refractive surgeries prior to ascertaining the fitness status.

PDF Share
  1. Wickremasinghe S, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, et al. Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(3):776–783. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0456
  2. Augusteyn RC, Nankivil D, Mohamed A, et al. Human ocular biometry. Exp Eye Res 2012;102:70–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.06.009
  3. Brown SA, Weih LM, Fu CL, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and associated refractive errors in an adult population in Victoria, Australia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2000;7(4):249–258. DOI: 10.1076/0928-6586(200012)741-YFT249
  4. Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, et al. Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43(5):1408–1413.
  5. Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The age- and gender-specific prevalences of refractive errors in Tehran: the Tehran eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11(3):213–225. DOI: 10.1080/09286580490514513
  6. Hoffer KJ, Savini G. Effect of gender and race on ocular biometry. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2017;57(3):137–142. DOI: 10.1097/iio.0000000000000180
  7. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Arnarsson A, et al. Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik eye study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83(6):734–738. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00540.x
  8. Chen MJ, Liu YT, Tsai CC, et al. Relationship between central corneal thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length. J Chin Med Assoc 2009;72(3):133–137. DOI: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70038-3
  9. Yebra-Pimentel E, González-Méijome JM, García-Resúa C, et al. The relationships between ocular optical components and implications in the process of emmetropization. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2008;83(5):307–316. DOI: 10.4321/s0365-66912008000500006
  10. Lyhne N, Sjølie AK, Kyvik KO, et al. The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(12):1470-1476. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.12.1470
  11. Ojaimi E, Morgan IG, Robaei D, et al. Effect of stature and other anthropometric parameters on eye size and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46(12):4424–4429. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0077
  12. Roy A, Kar M, Mandal D, et al. Variation of axial ocular dimensions with age, sex, height, BMI-and their relation to refractive status. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(1):AC01–AC04. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10555.5445
  13. Nangia V, Jonas JB, Matin A, et al. Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural Central India. The Central India eye and medical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248(11):1657–1666. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1448-0
  14. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, et al. The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42(6):1237–1242.
  15. Johnson GJ, Matthews A, Perkins ES. Survey of ophthalmic conditions in a Labrador community. I. Refractive errors. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63(6):440–448. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.63.6.440
  16. Rosner M, Laor A, Belkin M. Myopia and stature: findings in a population of 106,926 males. Eur J Ophthalmol 1995;5(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1177/112067219500500101
  17. Troilo D. Neonatal eye growth and emmetropisation: a literature review. Eye 1992;6(2):154–160. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1992.31
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.